Commit d8c7406f authored by Sarah Heidekorn's avatar Sarah Heidekorn
Browse files

thhe is corrected to the

parent e161dda0
......@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@
"When looking at the plot of the output dataset it is pretty safe to say that Edmonton has the lowest density of forest/wood information given when comparing it to the other regions. Although this might be part of low mapping activities too, it might as well be related to local oil and gas production areas or farmland which reduced the amount of forest. Another factor could be the general geographic connection to the Prairies Ecozone.\n",
"\n",
"Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that all cities, but Vancouver, only really added their forest information around 2010 and 2011. \n",
"Interestingly, the density-values for Vancouver only cross parts with the Ottawa- and Halifax-values around 2017. Additionally there is a strong increase in density in the early 2013 months. During that same year the Open Data Hackathon took place on Feb 23rd.\n",
"Interestingly, the density values for Vancouver only cross parts with the Ottawa- and Halifax-values around 2017. Additionally there is a strong increase in density in the early 2013 months. During that same year the Open Data Hackathon took place on Feb 23rd.\n",
"\n",
"Ottawa and Halifax both begin to have increasing information starting around the same period in 2010 and cross each other several times until Ottawa finally takes its place at the top in 2018. Densitywise Ottawa is the winner looking at the overall development of density throughout the years. \n",
"\n",
......@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
"display (val_density)\n",
"val_density.plot.barh(0, figsize=(8,8))\n",
"\n",
"#The table was created by searching for the mean, median, minimum and maximum-values of each region.\n",
"#The table was created by searching for the mean, median, minimum and maximum values of each region.\n",
"#You can do it with numpy, like so:\n",
"#Ottawa, Ontario:\n",
"#Oarray = df_density['Ottawa']\n",
......@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@
"source": [
"Apart from Ottawa there is no display of a minimum value in the barchart above. This is due to the fact that Edmonton and Halifax both started at zero in the beginning of the examined timespan but also because the initial value of Metro Vancouver was probably too small to be visible in the graphic.\n",
"\n",
"When looking at the chart one can once more see that Ottawa has the overall highest-density values when taking e.g. the mean or maximum-values into account, but even more so, it also has the highest initial (minimum) values!\n",
"When looking at the chart one can once more see that Ottawa has the overall highest density values when taking e.g. the mean or maximum values into account, but even more so, it also has the highest initial (minimum) values!\n",
"It is followed by Halifax & Vancouver. Edmonton comes last with the smallest overall values."
]
},
......@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@
"source": [
"#### Above you can see the Δ density and percentual-values in numbers as well as figures. You can notice that the development for ALL regions was very good as the minimum percentuage of growth in density is in Ottawa with 99.143%.\n",
"\n",
"As usual Edmonton shows the lowest values and Ottawa the highest. This is due to their overall development, yet it should be noted that the Δ density-values for Vancouver get really close to those of Ottawa and the starting values weren't much lower either which implies a very similar development over the whole timespan.\n",
"As usual Edmonton shows the lowest values and Ottawa the highest. This is due to their overall development, yet it should be noted that the Δ density values for Vancouver get really close to those of Ottawa and the starting values weren't much lower either which implies a very similar development over the whole timespan.\n",
"\n",
"**Δ Density Ranking:**\n",
"1. Ottawa\n",
......@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@
"3. Halifax\n",
"4. Edmonton\n",
"\n",
"_side note: The percentage-values aren't shown in a figure as they are all very similar and differences were hard to make out with the eyes only_"
"_side note: The percentage values aren't shown in a figure as they are all very similar and differences were hard to make out with the eyes only_"
]
},
{
......@@ -591,12 +591,12 @@
"#### Edmonton:\t \n",
"\n",
"Let's start from the top again.\n",
"There's almost no user activity from 2008 up until the end 2010. Notable user activity first starts around 2011 so at the same time as the main increase in density-values. One can observe that for certain time periods the user count keeps falling back to low or no user activity at all. Thhhe peak is reached by the end of 2017 but even after, there are still some quite high values. Furthermore, the peak also marks the time of the last notable increase in density information.\n",
"There's almost no user activity from 2008 up until the end 2010. Notable user activity first starts around 2011 so at the same time as the main increase in density values. One can observe that for certain time periods the user count keeps falling back to low or no user activity at all. The peak is reached by the end of 2017 but even after, there are still some quite high values. Furthermore, the peak also marks the time of the last notable increase in density information.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"#### Halifax:\t \n",
"\n",
"For the Halifax region there was nearly no user activity at all up until mid 2010 apart from a very short peak in the very beginning. The first peak in 2010 is in accord with the first strong density increase. However, after that the user numbers stay more or less on the same overall level until 2017 when they are peaking until about June of th same year which appears to be fitting the decreasing density-values around this time period either. There's one last peak in 2020.\n",
"For the Halifax region there was nearly no user activity at all up until mid 2010 apart from a very short peak in the very beginning. The first peak in 2010 is in accord with the first strong density increase. However, after that the user numbers stay more or less on the same overall level until 2017 when they are peaking until about June of th same year which appears to be fitting the decreasing density values around this time period either. There's one last peak in 2020.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"#### Vancouver: \n",
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment